It’s a UniParty. Regardless of who gets installed as the next President, we will get the same Treasury draining policy resulting in national decline. Around the edges, political fights for gains and losses on social and economic issues and limiting Constitutional erosion will continue. On the big picture of wars, debt, dollar devaluation, and unfunded government promises, nothing will change. The national decline will continue because that is the goal of the captured and controlled UniParty.
The debate accomplished its goal of arousing passions on either side of the aisle of the Kabuki theater. The media bias enrages Trump supporters, and Trump being Trump enrages Harris supporters. That’s the goal of the UniParty. To distract and focus on less significant political skirmishes, while the war is lost, i.e., the Constitution gets shredded and the national decline continues unabated.
All empires decline and fall, and the U.S. empire will be no different. The diversion to foreign interests over national interests is a root cause of the decline. George Washington foresaw this history and warned against foreign influence in his Farewell Address. Woodrow Wilson campaigned in his 1916 election that he would not enter the U.S. in WWI and immediately did the opposite after getting elected. The history behind that switch is not what you have been taught. The U.S. hasn’t heeded Washington’s Farewell warning of foreign alignments since, and now perpetual useless foreign entanglements and U.S. national decline make Washington’s warning prescient.
A reversal of our national decline will not occur through a presidential election under the present corrupt UniParty and Constitution-eroded system. It’s now impossible for a non-controlled, truly independent candidate to even get on the ballot, and it’s a crime to contest illegal voting. A reversal will have to occur through a grassroots effort, likely starting for the same inherent desire for freedom as at our founding.
We had wise men at our founding. Washington’s words:
“Observe good faith and justice toward all nations. Cultivate peace and harmony with all. Religion and morality enjoin this conduct, and can it be that good policy does not equally enjoin it?”
“In the execution of such a plan nothing is more essential than that permanent, inveterate antipathies against particular nations and passionate attachments for others should be excluded, and that in place of them just and amicable feelings toward all should be cultivated. The nation which indulges toward another an habitual hatred or an habitual fondness is in some degree a slave.”
“So, likewise, a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation of privileges denied to others, which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions by unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained, and by exciting jealousy, ill will, and a disposition to retaliate in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld; and it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens (who devote themselves to the favorite nation) facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own country without odium, sometimes even with popularity, gilding with the appearances of a virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable zeal for public good the base or foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation.”
“As avenues to foreign influence in innumerable ways, such attachments are particularly alarming to the truly enlightened and independent patriot. How many opportunities do they afford to tamper with domestic factions, to practice the arts of seduction, to mislead public opinion, to influence or awe the public councils!”
“The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is, in extending our commercial relations to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop.”